The absurdity of being asked to “come up with a counterproposal”

未分類

 In Japan, when strong criticism is voiced against a policy that the current administration is trying to implement, the critics often responds by saying, “Don’t just criticize, come up with a counterproposal.”

 The propriety of this matter depend on what position the critics are in.

 First, when the critic of a policy is a politician, the criticism of not offering a counterproposal may be reasonable in some cases. However, when current administration is trying to enact legislation that is considered unconstitutional, or when the administration is repeatedly giving incoherent answers in parliament, it is breaking the rules of democracy to make a law, so the criticism that the critics should “come up with a counterproposal” is just a false accusation.

 So what if the critic is not a politician? In this case, “come up with a counterproposal” is all a false accusation.

Japanese politicians are “representatives. In other words, they are “people chosen to debate on behalf of the people,” and on the premise of debating, they are given privileges such as collecting special information and receiving large salaries and allowances from taxes. Therefore, when strong criticism of a certain policy arises, what they have to do is to think of alternative proposals and debate them again. If the criticisms of “coming up with a counter-proposal” makes sense, then the representatives’ job is to decide by majority vote whether they agree or disagree. If this is the case, there is no reason for them to be privileged.

 In Japan, politicians exist as representatives, so such attacks like “coming up with a counter-proposal” against the citizens are unreasonable, and there is no need to keep our mouths shut.

☆☆☆

 Continued in ”Revolution and Blood”

☆☆☆

 Wish you beautiful days!

from Japan

 It would be greatly appreciated if you could support me from the button “Buy Me a Coffee” below my profile.

Buy Me a Coffee

未分類
Walleggandseedsをフォローする

コメント